CLU-IN HomeSkip common site navigation and headers
What's Hot? What's New? Remediation Characterization and MonitoringTraining Initiatives and Partnerships Publications and Studio Databases Software and Tools TechDirect and Newsletters Vendor and Developer Support About CLU-IN

Technology Innovation Program
CommentsSite MapEPA HomeCLU-IN Home
Select a Contaminant | Contaminant Focus Home | Suggest Resource
For more information on 1,4-Dioxane, please contact:
Marti Otto
Technology Assessment Branch
(703) 603-8853
otto.martha@epa.gov

Detection and Site Characterization

Until recently, the discovery of 1,4-dioxane at cleanup sites often occurred well after the completion of site characterization and remedial design, complicating implementation of effective remedial measures for the compound. The possible presence of 1,4-dioxane has not been investigated at the majority of solvent release sites due to the relatively recent development of the laboratory methods necessary to detect it at concentrations less than 100 µg/L, and to the recent and increasing awareness that it might be a contaminant of concern at solvent release sites.

Commercial laboratories commonly analyze for 1,4-dioxane in water by three methods: EPA 524.2 for drinking water, and EPA 8260 and 8270 (though the latter method does not list 1,4-dioxane) for ground water and hazardous waste. A modification to EPA 8260 has allowed lower detection limits. Determination of 1,4-dioxane in water at low detection levels is accomplished most often using modified EPA 8270 with liquid-liquid extraction and isotope dilution by capillary column gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). This GC-MS method is optimized for 1,4-dioxane as a single analyte.

The purpose of this section is to identify analytical and sampling methods commonly used for detecting, measuring, and/or monitoring 1,4-dioxane that are available on line. The intent is not to provide an exhaustive list of analytical methods, but to identify well-established, standard methods, particularly those used for environmental samples and approved by EPA.

Adapted from:

Adobe PDF Logo Solvent Stabilizers: White Paper
T.K.G. Mohr, Santa Clara Valley Water District, 2001.
Contact: Tom Mohr, tommohr@scvwd.dst.ca.us

Adobe PDF Logo1,4-Dioxane in Water by Selective Ion Monitoring (SIM) Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS): EPA CLP Method OLM03.1 (1994)
U.S. EPA Region 9, 3 pp, Revised 12/17/99.

Adobe PDF LogoAdvisory: Active Soil Gas Investigations
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 2003.

Analysis of 1,4-Dioxane by Heated Purge & Trap GC/MS
EPA Region 9 Laboratory SOP 307 [summary].

Adobe PDF LogoAppendix A to Part 136 Method 1624 Revision B—Volatile Organic Compounds by Isotope Dilution GC/MS

Adobe PDF LogoField Demonstration and Validation of a New Device for Measuring Water and Solute Fluxes, NASA LC-34 Site
Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP), 172 pp, 2006

ESTCP passive flux meter (PFM) demonstration and validation projects include MTBE flux measurement at Port Hueneme, perchlorate flux at the Naval Surface Warfare Center at Indianhead, and TCE flux at NASA Launch Complex 34 at Cape Canaveral.

Mass Flux Toolkit to Evaluate Groundwater Impacts, Attenuation, and Remediation Alternatives
Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP), 2006

To help site managers and site consultants estimate mass flux and understand the uncertainty in those estimates, ESTCP has funded the development of a computerized Mass Flux Toolkit, free software that gives site personnel the capability to compare different mass flux approaches, calculate mass flux from transect data, and apply mass flux to manage ground-water plumes. The toolkit spreadsheet and associated documentation are available on the ESTCP contractor's website in a zipped file.

Adobe PDF LogoNon-Purgeable Volatile Organic Compounds Rapidly Determined by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Using Direct Aqueous Injection
S.M. Pyle, A.B. Marcus, L.S. Johnson.
U.S. EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 1995.

Results Report for the Demonstration of No-Purge Groundwater Sampling Devices at Former McClellan Air Force Base, CA
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District, Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, and Air Force Real Property Agency. 79 pp, 2005

Analyses of VOCs, metals, anions, and 1,4-dioxane levels in samples from four diffusion and two grab-type no-purge samplers were compared to those from conventional low-flow and three-well-volume purge samples.

Adobe PDF LogoStandard Operating Procedure for Measurement of Purgeable 1,4-Dioxane in Water by GC/MS
EPA Region 1 Office of Environmental Measurement and Evaluation SOP VOADIOX3.

Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes: Physical/Chemical Methods, 3rd Edition
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, SW-846.

Adobe PDF LogoMethod 5030C: Purge-and-Trap for Aqueous Samples
Method 5031: Volatile, Nonpurgeable, Water-Soluble Compounds by Azeotropic Distillation
Method 5032: Volatile Organic Compounds by Vacuum Distillation
Method 5035A: Closed-System Purge-and-Trap and Extraction for Volatile Organics in Soil and Waste Samples
Method 8015C: Nonhalogenated Organics Using GC/FID
Method 8260B: Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)
Method 8261: Volatile Organic Compounds by Vacuum Distillation in Combination with Gas Chromatography/mass Spectrometry (VD/GC/MS)
Method 8270c: Semivolatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)

Literature References

Measurement and Monitoring Technologies for the 21st Century Initiative (21M2) Literature Search
Through the Measurement and Monitoring Technologies for the 21st Century initiative, EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) will identify and deploy promising measurement and monitoring technologies in response to waste management and site cleanup program needs by matching existing and emerging technologies with OSWER program and client needs.


purple divider