No deliveries for this seminar are currently scheduled.

You may be interested in the following archive of this seminar:

• April 13, 2010

This training introduces state regulators, environmental consultants, site owners, and community stakeholders to Quality Considerations for Munitions Response Projects (UXO-5, 2008), created by the ITRC's Unexploded Ordnance Team. In this document, quality is defined as "conformance to requirements." To manage quality, the quality requirements of the project must first be understood. Requirements must be precisely stated and clearly understood by everyone involved. A plan is then put in place to meet those requirements.

The UXO Team emphasizes taking a whole-system approach to designing, planning and managing a munitions response (MR) project to optimize quality. Whole-system design means optimizing not just parts, but the entire system (in this case the MR). Practically speaking, the UXO Team views MR project as a system made of processes, sub-processes, and tasks. Therefore, a process approach to planning and managing MR projects is recommended.

An MR plan properly developed using the process approach will contain quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) activities that need to be performed. Through the proper application of a process approach to plan and manage an MR project, the MR project should produce results of verifiable quality with sufficient QA and QC documentation for defensible decision making.

The document concludes with some real-world examples of how QA/QC planning and process control throughout an MR project can affect the results of the MR project, particularly how attention to quality during MR processes can influence follow-on processes and the project's final outcome.

This training course is intended for an intermediate audience and assumes a basic understanding of specialized processes associated with MR projects. Background information on some of the topics can be found in Munitions Response Historical Records Review (UXO-2, 2003) and Geophysical Prove-Outs for Munitions Response Projects (UXO-3, 2004), Survey of Munitions Response Technologies (UXO-4, 2006) and their associated Internet-based training courses

• Guy Warren, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (guy.warren1@alaska.gov)
• Bill Harmon, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (harmonw@michigan.gov)
• Jim Pastorick, UXO Pro, Inc. (jim@uxopro.com)
• Timothy Deignan, Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure Group (timothy.deignan@shawgrp.com)
• Bill Veith, US Army Corps of Engineers, Huntsville Center (William.D.Veith@usace.army.mil)

• Mary Yelken, ITRC Training Program Support (myelken@theyelkengroup.com)
• Juliana Cheatham, ITRC Training Program Support (jcheatham@theyelkengroup.com)

View tips and suggestions for registrants

Press the "Go to Training" button to view the seminar. Please be at this location at the beginning of the conference call.

The seminar is available for download in both Microsoft PowerPoint and Adobe Acrobat formats. Both formats include the instructors' notes.
These links open in a pop-up window. You may need to turn off any pop-up blockers or add *clu-in.org to your list of allowed sites for pop-ups.