Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

information

We are making some changes to CLU-IN. If you have any feedback or questions, please contact us.

Share |
Connect | Archived Internet Seminars and Podcasts News Feeds (RSS) TechDirect and Newsletters

Characterization, Cleanup, and Revitalization of Mining Sites

Treatment Technologies for Mining-Influenced Water Profile

Technology: Monitored Natural Attenuation

Report
Monitored Natural Attenuation Demonstration Report Operable Unit III, Monticello Mill Tailings Site, Monticello, Utah
Source or source contact: https://lmpublicsearch.lm.doe.gov/lmsites/s32631_mnt_mna%20demo%20report.pdf
Publication Date: December 2021
Document Type: PDF
Author: U.S. Department of Energy, Legacy Management
Prepared for:

Site Identifiers

Site Name: MONTICELLO MILL TAILINGS (USDOE)
EPA CERCLA ID: UT3890090035
Parent Name (if applicable): N/A

Miscellaneous Study Information

Operable Unit (OU): N/A
Sample Site ID: OUIII uranium plume
Site Status: Post operations
Technology Tested: Monitored Natural Attenuation
Technology Type: Passive
Technology Name: Monitored Natural Attenuation
Pre-treatment or No Pre-treatment: No pre-treatment
Source of MIW:Groundwater contaminated by mill tailings
Treatment Train? (Y/N): N
Specific Component for Performance Data: N/A
Technology Requirements: None
Geographic conditions/constraints: San Juan County, Utah
Scale: Full scale
Duration of Study: 2008-2019

Data Set #1

Constituent Information

Constituent: Uranium
Constituent Phase:U µg/L
Reported as Load (Y/N):Y

Pond Depth: N/A

Max influent/associated effluent

Max. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Min influent/associated effluent

Min. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated):Not Applicable

Max effluent/associated influent

Max. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient ConcentrationData not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated)Not Applicable

Min effluent/associated influent

Min. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration:Data not provided Data not provided
Associated Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
% Removal Efficiency (calculated): Not Applicable

Avg. influent concentration/associated time

Avg. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: 275
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): 2008

Med. influent concentration/associated time

Med. Influent/Pre/Upgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Influent/Pre/Upgradient): Data not provided

Avg. effluent concentration/associated time period

Avg. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: 160
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): 2019

Med. effluent concentration/associated time period

Med. Effluent/Post/Downgradient Concentration: Data not provided
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent/Post/Downgradient): Data not provided

Parameters and water chemistry associated with documented concentrations

Avg Percent Removal (reported): Data not provided
Influent/Pre/Upgradient or Effluent/Post/Downgradient parameters?:Data not provided
pH:Data not provided
DO:Data not provided
Water Temperature:Data not provided
Air Temperature:Data not provided
Eh:Data not provided
ORP:Data not provided
Specific Conductivity:Data not provided
Other Parameters:None N/A

Load Information


Loads Treated: Plume was 52 in 2008 and down to 30 in 2019 lbs
Flows treated:Data not provided
Flow rate:Data not provided

Treatment Evaluation

Were treatment goals met? (Y/N): On track
Performance Metrics:30 µg/L and "protectiveness and restoration to WQ standards in a time frame that is reasonable compared to that of other active groundwater remedies" (Both will take hundreds to thousands of years)
Limitations/Constraints:Data not provided
Longevity Estimates:Data not provided
Lessons Learned:Data not provided
Reported Cost Data:Data not provided
Other design details:data not provided
Other performance details:The contaminant plume is shrinking. "functioning as intended to prevent risk of exposure to contaminated groundwater through the use of Institutional Controls" Actual remediation to WQS is expected to take hundreds to thousands of years, regardless of whether active remediation is used or not, so MNA was deemed reasonable. The plume mass/concentration are a function of groundwater levels and can increase with increasing groundwater level.
Limitations to data found:Data not provided

Notes: Natural attenuation values represent before and after periods in time rather than influent/effluent

°Cdegrees Celsius
°Fdegrees Fahrenheit
µg/Lmicrograms per liter
µmhos/cmmicromhos per centimeter
µS/cmmicroSiemens per centimeter
AgSilver
AlAluminum
AsArsenic
AWQCAmbient Water Quality Criteria
BBoron
BaBarium
BCRBiochemical Reactor
BeBeryllium
BODBiochemical Oxygen Demand
CaCO3Calcium carbonate
CERCLAComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
cfscubic feet per second
CHITChitorem®
ClChloride
CoCobalt
CO3Carbon trioxide
COCConstituent of Concern
CODChemical Oxygen Demand
CrChromium
CuCopper
DOCDissolved Organic Carbon
EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency
FFluoride
FBRFluidized Bed Reactor
FeIron
ftfeet
gpmgallons per minute
GWGroundwater
HCO3Bicarbonate
HgMercury
KPotassium
lbspounds
MgMagnesium
MGMillion Gallons
Mg(OH)2Magnesium hydroxide
mg/Lmilligrams per liter
MnManganese
MoMolybdenum
mVmillivolts
NNitrogen
N/Anot applicable
NaSodium
NANot available
NDNot detected
NiNickel
NO3Nitrate
NO3 + NO2Nitrate + Nitrite
NRNot reported
NTUNephelometric Turbidity Unit
OHHydroxide
OUOperable Unit
PPhosphorus
PbLead
PRBPermeable Reactive Barrier
RARemedial Action
ROReverse osmosis
SAPSSuccessive Alkalinity Producing System
SbAntimony
SeSelenium
SO42-Sulfate
SRBSulfate Reducing Bacteria
STCSeep Treatment Cell
TDSTotal Dissolved Solids
TOCTotal Organic Carbon
TSSTotal Suspended Solids
UUranium
UFUltra-filtration
VVanadium
VFRVertical Flow Reactor
ZnZinc

LabelDescription
Site NameName of the site
EPA CERCLA IDEPA CERCLA ID number
Parent NameIf the test was conducted at a 'child' site or an alias, this is the name of the larger associated Superfund site.
Operable Unit (OU)Specific operable unit (OU) of the site if specified
Technology TestedName of the technology tested
Technology TypeThe technology type (i.e., active or passive/semi-passive)
Source of MIWSource of the MIW (e.g., adit drainage, groundwater)
Treatment Train? (Y/N)Whether the treatment was a treatment train (i.e., multiple individual technologies)
Specific Component for Performance DataComponent for which data are reported
Technology RequirementsRequirements of the technology (e.g., electricity, pH > or < X, dissolved oxygen < X, etc.)
Geographic conditions/ constraintsGeographic conditions/constraints (e.g., topography, climate)
Scale Scale of the technology (e.g., pilot, or full-scale application)
Duration of StudyLength of the study
ConstituentElement or ion treated
Constituent PhaseIdentity - contaminants of concern (COCs) and others having data/information on treatment
UnitUnit of concentration reported in study
Max. Influent ConcentrationMaximum influent concentration treated
Associated Effluent ConcentrationEffluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Max. Effluent ConcentrationMaximum effluent concentration treated
Associated Influent ConcentrationInfluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Min. Influent ConcentrationMinimum influent concentration treated and
Associated Effluent ConcentrationEffluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Min. Effluent ConcentrationMinimum effluent concentration treated and
Associated Influent ConcentrationInfluent concentration attained for maximum concentration treated
Avg. Influent ConcentrationAverage influent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time (Influent)Time over which average X was calculated
Med. Influent ConcentrationMedian influent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time Influent)Time over which average X was calculated
Avg. Effluent ConcentrationAverage effluent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent)Time over which average X was calculated
Med. Effluent ConcentrationMedian effluent concentration treated and associated time
Avg. Associated Time (Effluent)Time over which average X was calculated
Avg. Percent RemovalAverage percent removal
ParametersParameters associated with the concentrations of other data documented
Loads TreatedMass of constituent per unit flow
pHpH associated with documented concentrations
DODO associated with documented concentrations
Water TemperatureWater temperature associated with documented concentrations
Air TemperatureAir temperature associated with documented concentrations
ORPOxidation-reduction potential associated with documented concentrations
Specific ConductivitySpecific conductivity associated with documented concentrations
Flows treatedFlows treated
Were treatment goals met? (Y/N)Whether the testing met the treatment goals
Performance MetricsGoals or performance metrics upon which the treatment success was based
Limitations/ConstraintsAny limitations or constraints noted that contributed to success or failure
Longevity EstimatesEstimates of longevity, if provided
Lessons LearnedAny reported lessons learned
Reported Cost DataAny reported cost data
Other design detailsAny other design details provided in the sources cited
Other performance detailsAny other performance details provided in the sources cited
Limitations to the found dataLimitations to the data found (e.g., data in the source only presented as averages, so was unable to report maximum influent treated with corresponding effluent attained)
NotesAny notes