Search Result
REMEDIATION OF A FORMER CHEMICAL BLENDING FACILITY UTILIZING MULTIPLE METHODS INCLUDING IN SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATION AND SOIL TREATMENT
Knafla, A. and L. Vickerman.
RemTech 2018, 10-12 October, Banff, Alberta, Canada. 25 slides, 2018
Five techniques were used to optimize remediation efficiencies at a site affected to a depth of 9 m by petroleum hydrocarbons and solvents (ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, chlorine substituted): Tier 2 guideline development; a field mobile screening lab (GC-PID); ex situ and in situ chemical oxidation; and a mixed soil/bentonite cutoff wall. The field screening lab supported in-field waste classification and segregation. Ex situ chemical oxidation treatment of the appropriate waste classes resulted in notable landfill cost savings. A similar approach was used to treat a portion of soils to below Tier 2 guidelines, allowing the material to be used for backfilling instead of landfilling. In situ chemical oxidation achieved remediation of clay loam soils and a sand/gravel seam beneath the facility within a 6-month injection timeframe thanks to intensive injection grid spacing. Post-injection drilling confirmed Tier 2 guidelines had been met and no subsequent remediation was required.
Slides: https://www.esaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/18-Knafla.pdf
Longer abstract: https://www.esaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Abstracts-RT2018-56.pdf
RemTech 2018, 10-12 October, Banff, Alberta, Canada. 25 slides, 2018
Five techniques were used to optimize remediation efficiencies at a site affected to a depth of 9 m by petroleum hydrocarbons and solvents (ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, chlorine substituted): Tier 2 guideline development; a field mobile screening lab (GC-PID); ex situ and in situ chemical oxidation; and a mixed soil/bentonite cutoff wall. The field screening lab supported in-field waste classification and segregation. Ex situ chemical oxidation treatment of the appropriate waste classes resulted in notable landfill cost savings. A similar approach was used to treat a portion of soils to below Tier 2 guidelines, allowing the material to be used for backfilling instead of landfilling. In situ chemical oxidation achieved remediation of clay loam soils and a sand/gravel seam beneath the facility within a 6-month injection timeframe thanks to intensive injection grid spacing. Post-injection drilling confirmed Tier 2 guidelines had been met and no subsequent remediation was required.
Slides: https://www.esaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/18-Knafla.pdf
Longer abstract: https://www.esaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Abstracts-RT2018-56.pdf
The Technology Innovation News Survey welcomes your comments and
suggestions, as well as information about errors for correction. Please
contact Michael Adam of the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation
and Technology Innovation at adam.michael@epa.gov or (703) 603-9915
with any comments, suggestions, or corrections.
Mention of non-EPA documents, presentations, or papers does not constitute a U.S. EPA endorsement of their contents, only an acknowledgment that they exist and may be relevant to the Technology Innovation News Survey audience.