Documents

Search Results

Your search returned 1 record. Page 1 of 1

Monitoring Well Comparison Study: An Evaluation of Direct-Push versus Conventional Monitoring Wells Published 2002
This study, conducted by BP Corporation North America Inc. and the Underground Storage Tank (UST) Programs of U.S. EPA Regions 4 and 5, was undertaken to determine whether measurements of groundwater parameters obtained using direct-push wells are comparable to those obtained from conventional monitoring wells. Direct-push monitoring wells contained no filter pack and were pushed into the subsurface; conventional monitoring wells contained filter packs and were installed with typical drilling and completion methods. The measured parameters were groundwater levels, chemical concentrations (BTEX, MTBE, TSS, and naphthalene), hydraulic conductivity, and natural attenuation (geochemistry) parameters. The study was conducted at two sites in Ohio and two sites in Georgia and they were chosen so there was a wide-range of soils, conductivities, and concentrations.

Note: The CLU-IN Publications and Studio area only contains publications that are a sole or key source of information on a particular hazardous waste management problem. You may also visit the CLU-IN site-wide search engine to locate additional publications available through other areas of CLU-IN.