Search Result from the April 2010 Issue
| Return to Search | Return to Results |
AEROBIC BIOREMEDIATION OF 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE AND VINYL CHLORIDE AT FIELD SCALEDavis, G.B., B.M. Patterson, and C.D. Johnston. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, Vol 107 Nos 1-2, p 91-100, 2009
Aerobic bioremediation of 1,2 dichloroethane (1,2 DCA) and vinyl chloride
(VC) was evaluated at field scale in a layered, silty and fine-sand anaerobic
aquifer. Maximum concentrations of 1,2-DCA (2 g/L) and VC (0.75 g/L) in
groundwater were within 25 and 70% of pure compound solubility, respectively.
Aerobic conditions were induced by injecting air into sparging wells screened
20.5 to 21.5 m below ground (17 to 18 m below the water table). Using a cycle
of 23 h of air injection followed by three days of no air injection, 50 days
of air injection were accumulated over a 12-month period that included some
longer periods of operational shutdown. Oxygen and VOC probes and multilevel
samplers were used to determine changes of the primary contaminants and the
associated inorganic chemistry at multiple locations and depths. Air (oxygen)
was distributed laterally up to 25 m from the sparge points, with oxygen
partial pressures up to 0.7 atmospheres (28 to 35 mg/L in groundwater) near to
the sparge points. The dissolved mass of 1,2-DCA and VC was reduced by >99%
over the 590 m2 trial plot. The pH declined from nearly 11 to less than 9, and
sulfate concentrations increased dramatically, suggesting the occurrence of
mineral sulfide (e.g., pyrite) oxidation. Chloride and bicarbonate (aerobic
biodegradation byproducts) concentration increases were used to estimate
biodegradation of 300 to 1,000 kg of chlorinated hydrocarbons, although the
ratio of 1,2-DCA to VC that was biodegraded remained uncertain. The mass
biodegraded was comparable to but less than the 400 to 1,400 kg of chlorinated
compounds removed from the aqueous phase within a 10,000 m3 volume of the
aquifer. Due to the likely presence of nonaqueous-phase liquid, the relative
proportion of volatilization compared to biodegradation could not be
determined. The aerobic biodegradation rates were greater than those
previously estimated from laboratory-based studies.
The Technology Innovation News Survey welcomes your comments and
suggestions, as well as information about errors for correction. Please
contact Michael Adam of the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation
and Technology Innovation at adam.michael@epa.gov or (703) 603-9915
with any comments, suggestions, or corrections.
Mention of non-EPA documents, presentations, or papers does not constitute a U.S. EPA endorsement of their contents, only an acknowledgment that they exist and may be relevant to the Technology Innovation News Survey audience.