State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Site Profiles
Headley Cleaners, Downs, Kansas
Description
|
Public Water Supply (PWS) sampling in 1986 showed tetrachloroethylene(PCE) above the EPA maximum contaminant level (MCL) in one PWS well. The PWS well was then shut down. In 1991 another PWS well was found to be contaminated with PCE and PCE degradation products, it was also shut down. Investigations led to the source at the Headley Cleaners site. The former Headley Cleaners was located at the site from 1973 to 1979. Prior to 1973 the cleaners was located on the lot directly to the north from 1946 to 1973. Headley Cleaners utilized Stoddard solvent (petroleum hydrocarbon based) from 1946 until the mid-60s, before switching to PCE. The source was excavated. When other problem's arose with nitrates in other PWS wells a system was put in place to treat the water before it goes to public distribution and one of the initial wells which indicated PCE contamination was put back into service. Remediation Status: In active remediation |
Contaminants
Contaminants present and the highest amount
detected in both soil and groundwater.
Contaminant | Media | Concentration (ppb) | Nondetect |
---|---|---|---|
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | ||
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | soil | ||
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | groundwater | ||
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | soil | ||
Trichloroethene (TCE) | groundwater | ||
Trichloroethene (TCE) | soil |
Site Hydrology
Deepest Significant Groundwater Contamination: | ||
Plume Size: | ||
Average Depth to Groundwater: | 23ft |
Lithology and Subsurface Geology
Interbedded silt and clay underlain by sand and gravel Conductivity: 348ft/day Gradient: 0.01ft/ft |
||
shale bedrock |
||
micritic limestone |
Pathways and DNAPL Presence
Groundwater Sediments Soil DNAPL Present |
Vapor Intrusion Pathway
Has the potential for vapor intrusion (VI) been evaluated? |
No |
|
Has a vapor mitigation system been installed? |
No |
Remediation Scenario
Cleanup
Goals: |
Safe drinking water for the public water supply. PCE non-detect in drinking water. |
|
Remedy Level: |
Full Scale Remedy |
Technologies
Ex Situ Carbon Adsorption |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
|
Ex Situ Soil Removal |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
Costs
Cost
for Assessment: |
$50,403.70 | |
Cost
for Operation and Maintenance: |
$15,000-$18,000 per year | |
Total
Costs for Cleanup: |
Lessons Learned
Closer oversight during the excavation activities would likely have led to additional contaminant mass removal. A good working relationship with the City of Downs has reduced O&M costs associated with the GAC system. The City currently conducts routine O&M of the system. |
Contacts
Kansas Identified Sites List https://keap.kdhe.state.ks.us/BER_ISL/ISL_Pub_Detail.aspx?ProjectCode=C6 |