State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Site Profiles
Sta Brite Cleaners II, Sarasota, Florida
Description
|
Drycleaning was performed at this site from March 1995 until late 2005. PCE was used during the first three years of operations, and then the facility switched to petroleum solvent. There was a reported PCE discharge in 1995 during a filter change. The contaminant source area at the site is the soil beneath the facility floor slab under and in the near vicinity of the former location of the drycleaning machine. Remediation Status: Site closed |
Contaminants
Contaminants present and the highest amount
detected in both soil and groundwater.
Contaminant | Media | Concentration (ppb) | Nondetect |
---|---|---|---|
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | 469 ppb | |
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | soil | 9.7 ppb | |
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | groundwater | 164 ppb | |
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | soil | 14,700 ppb | |
Trichloroethene (TCE) | groundwater | 405 ppb | |
Trichloroethene (TCE) | soil | 72.5 ppb | |
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | 16 ppb | |
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | soil | 1.1 ppb |
Site Hydrology
Deepest Significant Groundwater Contamination: | 15ft bgs | |
Plume Size: | Plume Length: 70ft Plume Width: 30ft Plume Thickness: 15ft |
|
Average Depth to Groundwater: | 4ft |
Lithology and Subsurface Geology
Fine to medium-grained sand, slightly clayey Depth: 0-13ft bgs 13ft thick Conductivity: 0.021ft/day Gradient: 0.002ft/ft |
||
Fine to coarse-grained sand with thin limestone lenses Depth: 13-24ft bgs 11ft thick |
||
Fossiliferous limestone interbedded with silty clay Depth: 24-38.5ft bgs 14.5ft thick |
||
Clayey silt Depth: 38.5-43ft bgs 4.5ft thick |
||
Clayey fossiliferous limestone Depth: 43-61ft bgs 18ft thick |
Pathways and DNAPL Presence
Groundwater Sediments Soil DNAPL Present |
Vapor Intrusion Pathway
Has the potential for vapor intrusion (VI) been evaluated? |
No |
|
Has a vapor mitigation system been installed? |
Yes | |
Type of Vapor Mitigation System(s): |
Soil Vapor Extraction |
Remediation Scenario
Cleanup
Goals: |
Soil: PCE = 30 µg/kg Groundwater: PCE = 3.0 µg/L, TCE = 3.0 µg/L; cis 1,2-DCE = 70 µg/L |
Technologies
In Situ Bioremediation |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
|
In Situ Soil Vapor Extraction |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
|
Ex Situ Carbon Adsorption |
Date implemented: Final remediation design: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
Costs
Cost
for Assessment: |
$87,200 | |
Cost
for Operation and Maintenance: |
$69,500 (includes monitoring) $ 5,000 (site restoration) | |
Total
Costs for Cleanup: |
$264,100 |
Lessons Learned
1. This site probably could have been remediated by soil vacuum extraction only had it not been for a seasonally high water table (to less than 2 feet bgs). 2. Small diameter PVC wells (microwells) can be utilized as injection wells to deliver relatively small volumes of injectants into permeable sediments. 3. "Biopolishing", the introduction of a small amount of a carbon source into groundwater, where conditions are favorable for reductive dechlorination can be an effective, low-cost method for remediating sites with low levels of contaminants. 4. The alternative to injecting potassium lactate would have been monitored natural attenuation that could have continued for a number of years. |
Contacts
Aaron Cohen Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Cleanup, MS 4500 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850-245-8974 Aaron.Cohen@dep.state.fl.us Mike Lodato, PG - Consultant GeoSyntec Consultants 14055 Riveredge Drive, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33637 Phone: (813) 558 9829 E-mail: mLodato@Geosyntec.com |
Site Specific References
Site Assessment Report - November 1999 Remedial Action Plan - May 2000 Limited Remedial Action Plan (lactate injection): June 2004 Groundwater Monitoring Reports |