State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Site Profiles
Joyce Cleaners, Farmers Branch, Texas
Description
|
Joyce Cleaners facility is a leased space within a multi-tenant commercial retail strip center. The property was developed in the 1955 for commercial
use and is currently used for commercial purpose. It is assumed that the future use of the property will be commercial. The Joyce Cleaners facility still operational on the property. Remediation Status: Site closed |
Contaminants
Contaminants present and the highest amount
detected in both soil and groundwater.
Contaminant | Media | Concentration (ppb) | Nondetect |
---|---|---|---|
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | ||
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | groundwater | ||
Trichloroethene (TCE) | groundwater | ||
Vinyl Chloride | groundwater |
Site Hydrology
Deepest Significant Groundwater Contamination: | 20ft bgs | |
Plume Size: | ||
Average Depth to Groundwater: | 9ft |
Lithology and Subsurface Geology
Clayey Sand Gradient: 0.001ft/ft |
Pathways and DNAPL Presence
Groundwater Sediments Soil DNAPL Present |
Vapor Intrusion Pathway
Has the potential for vapor intrusion (VI) been evaluated? |
No |
|
Has a vapor mitigation system been installed? |
No |
Remediation Scenario
Cleanup
Goals: |
Clean up goals: MCLs |
|
Remedy Level: |
Full Scale Remedy |
Technologies
In Situ Biostimulation |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Results to date: Next Steps: |
|
In Situ Chemical Oxidation |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: |
Costs
Cost
for Assessment: |
||
Cost
for Operation and Maintenance: |
||
Total
Costs for Cleanup: |
$52, 121 (for ISCO event and GW monitoring) + $33,427 (for biostimulation injection event FY10) Total Cost = $88,548 |
Lessons Learned
Treating a large, dilute plume is not cost effective. Instead target the "hot spot" contaminent areas. Natural attentuation will continue to decrease the diluted concentrations as well. The soil concentrations were not a huge problem because the exposure pathway was not a problem since the site was covered in concrete for a majority of the area. |
Contacts
Richard Scharlach, Technical Specialist PST / DCRP Section Remediation Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) |