State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Site Profiles
Dry Clean USA # 11204, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Description
|
Drycleaning using PCE was performed at this site from 1985 to 1996. The facility currently is a dry drop-off location. The facility is located in a mixed commercial/residential setting. The nearest public water supply well is located approximately 2,670 ft east of the facility. An irrigation well is located approximately 120 ft southwest of the facility. Remediation Status: In active remediation |
Contaminants
Contaminants present and the highest amount
detected in both soil and groundwater.
Contaminant | Media | Concentration (ppb) | Nondetect |
---|---|---|---|
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | 202,000 ppb | |
1,1-Dichloroethene | groundwater | 1,390 ppb | |
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | groundwater | 87,200 ppb | |
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | soil | 765 ppb | |
Trichloroethene (TCE) | groundwater | 28,500 ppb | |
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | 6,720 ppb | |
Vinyl Chloride | groundwater | 17,300 ppb |
Site Hydrology
Deepest Significant Groundwater Contamination: | 53ft bgs | |
Plume Size: | Plume Length: 60ft Plume Width: 210ft Plume Thickness: 48ft |
|
Average Depth to Groundwater: | 5ft |
Lithology and Subsurface Geology
fine-grained sand Depth: 0-7ft bgs 7ft thick Conductivity: 44ft/day Gradient: 0.0015ft/ft |
||
Organic rich soil Depth: 7-8ft bgs 1ft thick Conductivity: 44ft/day |
||
Very fine to fine-grained sand Depth: 8-23ft bgs 15ft thick Conductivity: 44ft/day |
||
Sandy, oolitic limestone Depth: 23-34ft bgs 11ft thick Conductivity: 44ft/day |
||
Very fine-grained sand to medium-grained sand Depth: 34-50ft bgs 16ft thick Conductivity: 27ft/day |
||
limestone Depth: 50-70ft bgs 20ft thick Conductivity: 27ft/day |
Pathways and DNAPL Presence
Groundwater Sediments Soil DNAPL Present |
Remediation Scenario
Cleanup
Goals: |
Groundwater (MCLs): PCE = 3.0 µg/L, TCE = 3.0 µg/L; cis 1,2-DCE = 70 µg/L; trans 1,2-DCE = 100 µg/L; VC = 1.0 µg/L Soil: (soil cleanup target leachability standard) PCE = 30 ug/kg |
|
Remedy Level: |
Full Scale Remedy |
Technologies
Ex Situ Bioremediation |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
|
Ex Situ Soil Removal |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
Costs
Cost
for Assessment: |
$126,405 | |
Cost
for Operation and Maintenance: |
||
Total
Costs for Cleanup: |
Lessons Learned
1. PCR testing conducted after the Cl-Out injection events confirmed the presence of DHE. Ethene and ethane have been detected in groundwater samples. Augmenting the dextrose injections with Pseudomonous sp did not aid in reductive dechlorination of PCE to ethene and ethane. 2. The presence of the full range of daughter products and ethene and ethane in groundwater is sufficient evidence that the necessary strain of DHE is present in the groundwater at the site and therefore, PCR testing was not necessary. 3. The source area soil excvation, though useful in removing contaminant mass was not effective in removing sufficient mass in the unsaturated zone to preclude continued sourcing of groundwater contamination from contaminated soil through seasonal rises in the water table. Hence, SVE will be necessary to remove most of the remaining mass in the unsaturated zone. |
Contacts
Aaron Cohen Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Cleanup, MS 4500 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850-245-8974 Aaron.Cohen@dep.state.fl.us Mike McCoy, PG Earth Tech 30 South Keller Road, Suite 500 Orlando, Florida 32810-6101 (407) 331-5967 Michael.McCoy@earthtech.com |
Site Specific References
1. Site Assessment Report & Remedial Alternatives Analysis: February 2001 2. Bioremediation Feasibility Study: June 2001 3. Cl-out Pilot Study Plan: November 2001 4. Interim Source Removal & Bioremediation Pilot Study Report: March 2001 5. Remedial Action Plan (bioremediation): October 2005 6. Soil Remedial Action Plan (SVE); May 2008. 7. Groundwater monitoring reports |