State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Site Profiles
F&M Cleaners & Coin Laundry , Orlando, Florida
Description
|
PCE drycleaning operations were conducted at this site from August 1984 until July 1992. The drycleaning operation was housed in the bay of a shopping center located in a mixed retail commercial/residential setting.
the contaminant source area is the soil beneath the floor slab in the vicinity of the drycleaning machine. Remediation Status: In active remediation |
Contaminants
Contaminants present and the highest amount
detected in both soil and groundwater.
Contaminant | Media | Concentration (ppb) | Nondetect |
---|---|---|---|
Benzene | groundwater | 10.2 ppb | |
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | 65.4 ppb | |
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | groundwater | 1,030 ppb | |
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) | soil | 313 ppb | |
Trichloroethene (TCE) | groundwater | 36.7 ppb | |
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | groundwater | 4.1 ppb |
Site Hydrology
Deepest Significant Groundwater Contamination: | 17ft bgs | |
Plume Size: | Plume Length: 280ft Plume Width: 90ft Plume Thickness: 12ft |
|
Average Depth to Groundwater: | 5.31ft |
Lithology and Subsurface Geology
fine-grained sand with some organic material Depth: 0-3ft bgs 3ft thick Conductivity: 5.99ft/day Gradient: 0.001ft/ft |
||
fine to medium-grained sand Depth: 3-24ft bgs 21ft thick |
||
sandy clay Depth: 24-24.5ft bgs 0.5ft thick |
||
fine to medium grained sand Depth: 24.5-35.5ft bgs 11ft thick |
||
sandy clay Depth: 35.5-37ft bgs 1.5ft thick |
||
fine-grained phosphatic sand Depth: 37-51ft bgs 14ft thick |
||
phosphatic clay Depth: 51-53ft bgs 2ft thick |
||
sandy, phosphatic limestone Depth: 53-57.5ft bgs 4.5ft thick |
||
fine to medium-grained phosphatic sand Depth: 57.5-69.5ft bgs 12ft thick |
||
interbedded phosphatic limestone, sandy silt and phosphatic clay Depth: 69.5-90ft bgs 20.5ft thick |
||
plastic to sandy clay Depth: 90-96ft bgs 6ft thick |
Pathways and DNAPL Presence
Groundwater Sediments Soil DNAPL Present |
Vapor Intrusion Pathway
Has the potential for vapor intrusion (VI) been evaluated? |
No |
|
Has a vapor mitigation system been installed? |
Yes | |
Type of Vapor Mitigation System(s): |
Soil Vapor Extraction |
Remediation Scenario
Cleanup
Goals: |
Soil: PCE = 30 ug/kg Groundwater: PCE = 3 ug/l; TCE = 3 ug/l; Cis 1,2-DCE = 70 ug/l; trans 1,2-DCE = 100 ug/l; 1,1-DCE = 7 ug/l, benzene = 1 ug/l |
|
Remedy Level: |
Full Scale Remedy |
Technologies
In Situ Bioremediation |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
|
In Situ Soil Vapor Extraction |
Why the technology was selected: Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
|
Ex Situ Carbon Adsorption |
Date implemented: Final remediation design: Results to date: Next Steps: Cost to Design and Implement: |
Costs
Cost
for Assessment: |
$137,500 | |
Cost
for Operation and Maintenance: |
||
Total
Costs for Cleanup: |
Lessons Learned
Nutrients can be successfully introduced into the the shallow portion of the aquifer via lateral vapor extraction wells. |
Contacts
Aaron Cohen Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Cleanup, MS 4500 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850-245-8974 Aaron.Cohen@dep.state.fl.us Mike Lodato, PG Geosyntec Consultants 14055 Riveredge Drive, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33637 Phone: (813) 558-0990 E-mail: mlodato@geosyntec.com |
Site Specific References
Site Assessment Report: 2001 Remedial Action Plan; January 2002 SVE Construction Completion Report: March 2003. Modified Remedial Action Plan (Biormediation): December 2005 Operation & Maintenance/Monitoring Reports: 2003 - 2008 |