U.S. EPA Contaminated Site Cleanup Information (CLU-IN)


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. EPA Technology Innovation and Field Services Division

Fractured Bedrock Project Profiles

Last Updated: March 22, 2010

Point of Contact:
Julie Konzuk
GeoSyntec Consultants
130 Research Lane, Suite 2
Guelph ON N1G 5G3 
Tel: 519-822-2230 
Fax: 519-822-3151
Email: jkonzuk@
geosyntec.com

Fractured Bedrock Site in South Carolina
Unknown, SC


Hydrogeology:

Discretely fractured metagabbro overlain by saprolite makes up the bedrock environment at the site. The top portion of the metagabbro, less than 80 feet below ground surface (bgs), contains smaller, less conductive fractures that are hydraulically connected to the saprolite [well yields range from <5 to 15 gallons per minute (gpm)]. Approximately 140 to 160 bgs, a large, deep horizontal fracture system originates (well yields >40 gpm). Primary pathway of contamination originates in the top portion of the metagabbro with a second pathway in the 140-160 bgs section.

Targeted Environmental Media:
  • - Dense Non-aqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPLs)
  • - Fractured Bedrock

Contaminants:

Major Contaminants and Maximum Concentrations:
  • - Tetrachloroethene (0 µg/L)

Site Characterization Technologies:

  • - Borehole Geophysics
    • Other (Unknown downhole geophysics)
  • - Fluid Loggings
    • Conductivity/Resistivity
  • - Flow
    • Electromagnetic Flowmeter
  • - Pumping Tests
  • - Coring
  • - Other (Pressure pulse interference testing)

Comments:
A two phase process was used to perform hydraulic and chemical characterization of the groundwater system. The first phase consisted of two parts: 1) hydraulic characterization of in-borehole flow including electromagnetic borehole flowmeter (EBF), down-hole geophysics, and depth-discrete sampling; and 2) an assessment of the fracture connectivity which was achieved using short-duration pump testing and pressure-pulse interference testing. The second phase consisted of the installation of monitoring and injection/extraction wells and EBF characterization pump testing and sampling to confirm fracture connectivity, well yields, and capture zones.


Remedial Technologies:

  • - Chemical Oxidation (In Situ)
    • Permanganate
  • - Bioremediation (In Situ)
Comments:
Bench-scale testing was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of bioremediation and in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO). ISCO was selected for the pilot-scale testing which consisted of sodium permanganate up to 2 grams per liter for 3 weeks followed by groundwater recirculation with no oxidant addition for 4 weeks. Full-scale implementation consisted of ISCO injection and recirculation on a cycled rotation targeting the source area and the deep fracture pathway that presented the greatest risk for off-site migration. Permanganate amendment will continue for 3 years with monitored natural attenuation as a finishing treatment.
Remediation Goals:

None provided


Lessons Learned:

The full-scale remedial system was designed through preliminary technology assessment followed by a systematic evaluation of design factors.

References:
Konzuk, Julie, Leah MacKinnon, Suzanne OHara, Eric Hood, and Evan Cox. Testing and Design of a Full-Scale Chemical Oxidation System in Fractured Bedrock, Platform Abstract Session A4. Presented at the Sixth International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds. Monterey, CA. May 19-22, 2008.

Top of Page

For more information on Fractured Bedrock, please contact:

Ed Gilbert
Technology Assessment Branch

PH: (703) 603-8883 | Email: gilbert.edward@epa.gov