Search Result
Technology Innovation News Survey Feed (RSS)
METHYLMERCURY SCREENING MODELS FOR SURFACE WATER HABITAT RESTORATION: A CASE STUDY IN DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR
Gidley, P.T., J.P. Kreitinger, M. Zakikhani, and B.C. Suedel.
ERDC/EL TR-17-19, 59 pp, 2017
The placement of dredged material for creating vegetated shallow water aquatic habitat is being assessed for changes in long-term bioavailability of Hg to wildlife and humans. The three models used in this study (HERMES, WASP, and SERAFM) were applied in different ways to explore the strengths of each model, rather than to make direct comparisons between them. The HERMES model, which was most explicitly changed to account for aquatic plant growth, showed the greatest increases in sediment methylmercury (MeHg). The WASP model, which was most likely simulating a situation where dredged material is placed and aquatic plants do not grow, showed the least overall changes in surface water and sediment MeHg. The SERAFM model, which had the least flushing of the surface water in the restored scenario, showed the greatest increases in surface water MeHg (despite entered reductions in sediment Hg). This study focused on the usefulness of each of the models separately for their ability to predict long-term MeHg changes in sediment, sediment pore water, surface water (including suspended particulates), and dissolved-in surface water after the creation of shallow water habitat, relative to a "no-action" scenario at the site. https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/p266001coll1/id/5916/download
ERDC/EL TR-17-19, 59 pp, 2017
The placement of dredged material for creating vegetated shallow water aquatic habitat is being assessed for changes in long-term bioavailability of Hg to wildlife and humans. The three models used in this study (HERMES, WASP, and SERAFM) were applied in different ways to explore the strengths of each model, rather than to make direct comparisons between them. The HERMES model, which was most explicitly changed to account for aquatic plant growth, showed the greatest increases in sediment methylmercury (MeHg). The WASP model, which was most likely simulating a situation where dredged material is placed and aquatic plants do not grow, showed the least overall changes in surface water and sediment MeHg. The SERAFM model, which had the least flushing of the surface water in the restored scenario, showed the greatest increases in surface water MeHg (despite entered reductions in sediment Hg). This study focused on the usefulness of each of the models separately for their ability to predict long-term MeHg changes in sediment, sediment pore water, surface water (including suspended particulates), and dissolved-in surface water after the creation of shallow water habitat, relative to a "no-action" scenario at the site. https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/p266001coll1/id/
The Technology Innovation News Survey welcomes your comments and
suggestions, as well as information about errors for correction. Please
contact Michael Adam of the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation
and Technology Innovation at adam.michael@epa.gov or (703) 603-9915
with any comments, suggestions, or corrections.
Mention of non-EPA documents, presentations, or papers does not constitute a U.S. EPA endorsement of their contents, only an acknowledgment that they exist and may be relevant to the Technology Innovation News Survey audience.
